Evaluation tribunals
The courts in charge of the evaluation of the TFG will be composed of a minimum of two and a maximum of three professors assigned to departments with teaching in the Degree, of which at least one will be attached to the area of knowledge in which the work is framed. Whenever possible, care shall be taken to ensure that the members of the tribunal do not belong to the same area of knowledge, unless it is not for well-founded and objective reasons, duly reasoned.
The center is responsible for the organization of the sessions of the courts and the appointment of their members, which will be made public well in advance in each call.
Format and rules for the presentation of the report
Prior to each call, you can enable a pre-registration period to request the defense of the TFG in that call. The pre-registration will not oblige the student to present and defend the TFG in said call, if it finally decides, although in order to defend the work at that time it must necessarily have been pre-registered, sending the web form that is established for this purpose.
Subsequently, within the deadlines established according to the academic calendar, students will deposit a copy of the TFG's memory, in electronic format, through the telematic means that are enabled by the University of Oviedo, following the style guide of the TFG of the Faculty of Economics and Business. In this report:
· The name of the work guardian should not appear.
· The title and a summary in English of the submitted paper should be included.
· It must be included, compulsorily, a statement from the student that ensures the originality of the work and that the sources used have been duly cited. The court evaluating the work may use computer tools to detect matches.
Students will not require the approval of the tutor or tutors to present and defend the TFGs.
The tutor or guardians will incorporate after the time of deposit and, in any case, prior to the act of defense, a single reasoned report on the supervised work, in which their qualification will be recorded, which will be sent to the center by the telematic means that are enabled for this purpose.
Format of the act of public presentation of the TFG
The defense of the TFG will be carried out by the students in a public and face-to-face manner. The center may authorize remote defense virtually, as long as it is justified and the technical, administrative and economic conditions that allow its viability are met.
The defense will consist of the oral presentation of the TFG in the spaces that the faculty reserves for this purpose or in the way that is established if the defense is carried out virtually. The student will have to present his work orally before a court for a time not exceeding 15 minutes and then answer the questions raised by the members of the court.
The Faculty will establish the day, time and place or form of celebration of the defenses of the TFG and will communicate it to all the students and professors affected by its publication on the website and through the usual information channels.
Evaluation of student learning
The evaluation of students' learning will have as a fundamental criterion the level of integrated acquisition of the competences of the Degree in Economics. To facilitate the evaluation task and ensure homogeneity in the evaluations, the members of the panel will complete an assessment report, according to the format proposed by the center, for each student evaluated, which must collect the grade awarded. The final grade obtained by the student will be calculated based on the following criteria:
Grade of the TFG report: it will constitute 60% of the total grade of the subject and includes the evaluation of the progress followed by the student, the final quality of the work, its adaptation to the competences of the degree, the bibliography used and the student's capacity for written expression. Based on these criteria, the tutor, in his report, will award a maximum of 4 points, while the members of the court will award a maximum of 2 points.
Qualification of the public presentation of the TFG: it will constitute 40% of the total qualification of the subject and will be granted by the members of the tribunal who will evaluate, among others, the competences acquired in the field of oral communication and capacities of debate and defense of the work, as well as the capacity of synthesis of the work presented.
Summary table
Aspects
|
Teachers who qualify
|
Weight in the final grade (%)
|
TFG Memory
|
Tutor (or tutors) of the TFG
|
40%
|
Court of the TFG
|
20%
|
Public Defense of the TFG
|
Court of the TFG
|
40%
|
The evaluation board shall draw up a report, in the format established by the centre, in which at least the result of the evaluation shall be recorded; the proposal, if applicable, for 'honours'; the language in which it was defended and the members of it who, eventually, would have intervened telematically.
After the evaluation, the court will communicate to the student the grade obtained, as well as the proposal, if applicable, of honors, and the student may request the review before the same court.
The center, once the minutes have been validated by at least the President and Secretary of the court, will proceed to make the student's grade public.
Each evaluation board may propose the reasoned granting of the mention of "honors" to one or more TFG that it has evaluated and that have obtained a grade equal to or greater than 9. This motivation must include the innovative and excellent aspects that, in the opinion of the court, make it worthy of the aforementioned mention. The number of mentions finally awarded may not exceed 5% of the students enrolled in the corresponding subject of the TFG in each academic year, unless the number of students enrolled is less than 20, in which case a single "honors" may be granted. For these purposes, the number of enrolled students who have paid the concept corresponding to the defense will be taken as a reference. In the event that the number of proposals is higher than the number of mentions available, the allocation of registrations will be carried out taking into account the average grade of the academic record corresponding to the set of basic, compulsory and optional subjects of the degree.
In accordance with the Regulations for the evaluation of learning outcomes and competences acquired by the students of the University of Oviedo, the fraudulent use of the work of others as if it were one's own and with the intention of taking advantage of it for one's own benefit will imply the qualification of 0-Suspenso (SS) of the TFG in the corresponding call, this regardless of other responsibilities that the student may incur.
It is recalled that the Code of Ethics of the University of Oviedo is in force and applicable, which can be accessed from the following link: University of Oviedo - Code of Ethics (uniovi.es)
The centre shall publish the provisional notes before the third working day after the last defence session.
The review or claim of the qualifications of the TFG will be carried out in accordance with the deadlines provided for in the regulations on evaluation of the University of Oviedo, although in this case, because it is a court, the review of the evaluation in the first instance will be carried out before the same court, once the act of defense has concluded. The procedure to be followed for the claim of the final grades of the TFG will be the same as for the rest of the subjects of the degree, included in the agreement of June 17, 2013, of the Governing Council of the University of Oviedo, which approves the revised text of the regulations for the evaluation of learning results and the competences acquired by the students.